Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 357
Filtrar
1.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ; 119(8)2022 02 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35177474

RESUMEN

Viral causes of pneumonia pose constant threats to global public health, but there are no specific treatments currently available for the condition. Antivirals are ineffective when administered late after the onset of symptoms. Pneumonia is caused by an exaggerated inflammatory cytokine response to infection, but tissue necrosis and damage caused by virus also contribute to lung pathology. We hypothesized that viral pneumonia can be treated effectively if both virus and inflammation are simultaneously targeted. Combined treatment with the antiviral drug cidofovir and etanercept, which targets tumor necrosis factor (TNF), down-regulated nuclear factor kappa B-signaling and effectively reduced morbidity and mortality during respiratory ectromelia virus (ECTV) infection in mice even when treatment was initiated after onset of clinical signs. Treatment with cidofovir alone reduced viral load, but animals died from severe lung pathology. Treatment with etanercept had no effect on viral load but diminished levels of inflammatory cytokines and chemokines including TNF, IL-6, IL-1ß, IL-12p40, TGF-ß, and CCL5 and dampened activation of the STAT3 cytokine-signaling pathway, which transduces signals from multiple cytokines implicated in lung pathology. Consequently, combined treatment with a STAT3 inhibitor and cidofovir was effective in improving clinical disease and lung pathology in ECTV-infected mice. Thus, the simultaneous targeting of virus and a specific inflammatory cytokine or cytokine-signaling pathway is effective in the treatment of pneumonia. This approach might be applicable to pneumonia caused by emerging and re-emerging viruses, like seasonal and pandemic influenza A virus strains and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.


Asunto(s)
Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/administración & dosificación , Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Cidofovir/uso terapéutico , Etanercept/administración & dosificación , Neumonía Viral/tratamiento farmacológico , Animales , Antivirales/farmacología , Línea Celular , Chlorocebus aethiops , Cidofovir/farmacología , Citocinas/metabolismo , Evaluación Preclínica de Medicamentos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Virus de la Ectromelia/efectos de los fármacos , Femenino , Pulmón/efectos de los fármacos , Pulmón/metabolismo , Ratones Endogámicos C57BL , FN-kappa B/metabolismo , Neumonía Viral/metabolismo , Factor de Transcripción STAT3/metabolismo , Transducción de Señal/efectos de los fármacos , Factor de Necrosis Tumoral alfa/antagonistas & inhibidores , Carga Viral/efectos de los fármacos
2.
Pharmacol Res Perspect ; 10(2): e00926, 2022 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35174650

RESUMEN

The chronic neurological aspects of traumatic brain injury, post-stroke syndromes, long COVID-19, persistent Lyme disease, and influenza encephalopathy having close pathophysiological parallels that warrant being investigated in an integrated manner. A mechanism, common to all, for this persistence of the range of symptoms common to these conditions is described. While TNF maintains cerebral homeostasis, its excessive production through either pathogen-associated molecular patterns or damage-associated molecular patterns activity associates with the persistence of the symptoms common across both infectious and non-infectious conditions. The case is made that this shared chronicity arises from a positive feedback loop causing the persistence of the activation of microglia by the TNF that these cells generate. Lowering this excess TNF is the logical way to reducing this persistent, TNF-maintained, microglial activation. While too large to negotiate the blood-brain barrier effectively, the specific anti-TNF biological, etanercept, shows promise when administered by the perispinal route, which allows it to bypass this obstruction.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/complicaciones , Etanercept/uso terapéutico , Accidente Cerebrovascular/complicaciones , COVID-19/metabolismo , COVID-19/patología , Etanercept/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Inyecciones Espinales , Microglía/metabolismo , Microglía/patología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/metabolismo , Síndrome , Factor de Necrosis Tumoral alfa/metabolismo , Síndrome Post Agudo de COVID-19
3.
Biomolecules ; 11(10)2021 10 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34680168

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular (CV) morbidity, mortality, and metabolic syndrome are associated with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Here, lipids and other metabolic markers in relation to vascular function and clinical markers were evaluated in RA and AS patients undergoing one-year anti-TNF therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-three patients including 36 RA patients treated with either etanercept (ETN) or certolizumab pegol (CZP) and 17 AS patients treated with ETN were included in a 12-month follow-up study. Various lipids, paraoxonase (PON) and arylesterase (ARE) activities, myeloperoxidase (MPO) and adipokine levels were determined overtime. Ultrasonography was performed to determine flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD), common carotid intima-media thickness (ccIMT), and arterial pulse-wave velocity (PWV) in all patients. All assessments were performed at baseline and 6 and 12 months after treatment initiation. RESULTS: Anti-TNF therapy decreased ARE activity, MPO, adiponectin, and chemerin levels after 12 months (p < 0.05). Lipids, PON activity, and leptin remained unchanged. Regression analyses suggested variable associations of IMT, PWV, and FMD with ARE, MPO, leptin, and lipids (p < 0.05). On the other hand, these metabolic parameters were significantly associated with disease duration, CV history, CRP, obesity, PWV, and IMT (p < 0.05). One-year anti-TNF treatment together with baseline leptin (p = 0.039) or CRP (p = 0.016) levels determined 12 months of lipid changes overtime. TNF inhibition together with baseline disease activity determined ARE activity changes (p = 0.046). Anti-TNF therapy and baseline chemerin levels determined IMT changes overtime (p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Assessment of various metabolic parameters together with disease activity, CRP, and ultrasound-based techniques may exert additional value in determining CV burden and in monitoring the effects of biologics on preclinical vascular pathophysiology.


Asunto(s)
Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Proteína C-Reactiva/metabolismo , Obesidad/tratamiento farmacológico , Espondilitis Anquilosante/tratamiento farmacológico , Factor de Necrosis Tumoral alfa/genética , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Artritis Reumatoide/sangre , Artritis Reumatoide/complicaciones , Artritis Reumatoide/metabolismo , Arildialquilfosfatasa/sangre , Biomarcadores/sangre , Hidrolasas de Éster Carboxílico/sangre , Grosor Intima-Media Carotídeo , Certolizumab Pegol/administración & dosificación , Etanercept/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Factores de Riesgo de Enfermedad Cardiaca , Humanos , Metabolismo de los Lípidos/efectos de los fármacos , Lípidos/sangre , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Obesidad/sangre , Obesidad/complicaciones , Peroxidasa/sangre , Espondilitis Anquilosante/sangre , Espondilitis Anquilosante/complicaciones , Factor de Necrosis Tumoral alfa/antagonistas & inhibidores
4.
Pediatr Rheumatol Online J ; 19(1): 131, 2021 Aug 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34419107

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We aimed to characterize etanercept (ETN) use in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) patients enrolled in the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance (CARRA) Registry. METHODS: The CARRA Registry is a convenience cohort of patients with paediatric onset rheumatic diseases, including JIA. JIA patients treated with ETN for whom the month and year of ETN initiation were available were included. Patterns of ETN and methotrexate (MTX) use were categorized as follows: combination therapy (ETN and MTX started concurrently), step-up therapy (MTX started first and ETN added later), switchers (MTX started and then stopped when or before ETN started), MTX add-on (ETN started first and MTX added later), and ETN only (no MTX use). Data were described using parametric and non-parametric statistics as appropriate. RESULTS: Two thousand thirty-two of the five thousand six hundred forty-one patients with JIA met inclusion criteria (74% female, median age at diagnosis 6.0 years [interquartile range 2.0, 11.0]. Most patients (66.9%) were treated with a non-biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD), primarily MTX, prior to ETN. There was significant variability in patterns of MTX use prior to starting ETN. Step-up therapy was the most common approach. Only 34.0% of persistent oligoarticular JIA patients continued treatment with a non-biologic DMARD 3 months or more after ETN initiation. ETN persistence overall was 66.3, 49.4, and 37.3% at 24, 36 and 48 months respectively. ETN persistence among spondyloarthritis patients (enthesitis related arthritis and psoriatic JIA) varied by MTX initiation pattern, with higher ETN persistence rates in those who initiated combination therapy (68.9%) and switchers/ETN only (73.3%) patients compared to step-up (65.4%) and MTX add-on (51.1%) therapy. CONCLUSION: This study characterizes contemporary patterns of ETN use in the CARRA Registry. Treatment was largely in keeping with American College of Rheumatology guidelines.


Asunto(s)
Artritis Juvenil/tratamiento farmacológico , Quimioterapia Combinada/métodos , Etanercept , Metotrexato , Artritis Juvenil/diagnóstico , Artritis Juvenil/epidemiología , Artritis Juvenil/inmunología , Niño , Protocolos Clínicos , Monitoreo de Drogas/métodos , Duración de la Terapia , Etanercept/administración & dosificación , Etanercept/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunosupresores/administración & dosificación , Inmunosupresores/efectos adversos , Masculino , Administración del Tratamiento Farmacológico/estadística & datos numéricos , Metotrexato/administración & dosificación , Metotrexato/efectos adversos , Sistema de Registros/estadística & datos numéricos , Inhibidores del Factor de Necrosis Tumoral/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores del Factor de Necrosis Tumoral/efectos adversos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
5.
Isr Med Assoc J ; 23(6): 344-349, 2021 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34155846

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of real-life clinical data for biosimilar etanercept, an anti-TNF blocking fusion protein. We describe the comparable efficacy and safety of originator and biosimilar etanercept in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients in a real-life clinical setting. Our data confirm that a biosimilar etanercept can be safely used as first-line treatment as well as in patients switched from a previous originator compound. OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy and safety of originator and biosimilar etanercept in a cohort of RA patients attending two Italian hospitals. METHODS: The study involved 81 consecutive adult RA patients treated for at least 6 months with originator or biosimilar etanercept and considered their clinical and laboratory data, concomitant medications, and adverse events at baseline, and after 3 and 6 months of treatment. RESULTS: Group 1 included 51 patients taking originator etanercept; group 2 included 30 taking biosimilar etanercept, including 19 who had been switched from the reference product. Despite a significant baseline difference in clinical disease activity, one-way analysis of variance showed that the two groups were clinically comparable after 6 months of treatment, and the same was true when only those receiving etanercept as first-line biological treatment were considered. Nine patients discontinued the treatment due to inefficacy or adverse events, which were never serious and were only reported in group 1. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy and safety profiles of originator and biosimilar etanercept are comparable in RA patients in a real-life clinical setting. Further studies are needed to confirm these preliminary findings.


Asunto(s)
Artritis Reumatoide , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos , Sustitución de Medicamentos/métodos , Etanercept , Prioridad del Paciente , Antirreumáticos/administración & dosificación , Antirreumáticos/efectos adversos , Artritis Reumatoide/sangre , Artritis Reumatoide/diagnóstico , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/administración & dosificación , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/efectos adversos , Sedimentación Sanguínea/efectos de los fármacos , Proteína C-Reactiva/análisis , Investigación sobre la Eficacia Comparativa , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Monitoreo de Drogas/métodos , Etanercept/administración & dosificación , Etanercept/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Italia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud , Gravedad del Paciente , Seguridad del Paciente , Resultado del Tratamiento
6.
J Reprod Immunol ; 146: 103340, 2021 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34139652

RESUMEN

The pathophysiology of endometriosis is still unknown and treatment options remain controversial. Searches focus on angiogenesis, stem cells, immunologic and inflammatory factors. This study investigated the effects of etanercept and cabergoline on ovaries, ectopic, and eutopic endometrium in an endometriosis rat model. This randomized, placebo-controlled, blinded study included 50 rats, Co(control), Sh(Sham), Cb(cabergoline), E(etanercept), and E + Cb(etanercept + cabergoline) groups. After surgical induction of endometriosis, 2nd operation was performed for endometriotic volume and AMH level. After 15 days of treatment: AMH level, flow cytometry, implant volume, histologic scores, immunohistochemical staining of ectopic, eutopic endometrium, and ovary were evaluated at 3rd operation. All groups had significantly reduced volume, TNF-α, VEGF, and CD 146/PDGF-Rß staining of endometriotic implants comparing to the Sh group (p < 0.05).TNF-α staining of eutopic endometrium in all treatment groups was similar to Sh and Co groups (p > 0.05). E and E + Cb groups significantly decreased TNF-α staining in the ovary comparing to Sh, Co, and Cb groups (p < 0.05). All treatment groups had significantly higher AFC compared to the Sh group. CD25+ Cells' median percentage was significantly increased in the E + Cb group compared to Co, Sh, Cb, and E group. E + Cb group had a significantly higher CD5+ Cells' level than the Co group (p = 0.035). In conclusion; Etanercept and/or Cabergoline decreased volume, TNF-α, VEGF, and CD 146/PDGF-Rß staining of the ectopic endometrial implant. E and E + Cb treatment decreased TNF-α levels in the ovary. E + Cb also increased peripheral blood CD25+ & CD5+ Cell's.


Asunto(s)
Cabergolina/administración & dosificación , Endometriosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Endometrio/efectos de los fármacos , Etanercept/administración & dosificación , Animales , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Evaluación Preclínica de Medicamentos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Endometriosis/inmunología , Endometriosis/patología , Endometrio/inmunología , Endometrio/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Ovario/efectos de los fármacos , Ovario/inmunología , Ovario/patología , Ratas , Factor de Necrosis Tumoral alfa/metabolismo , Factor A de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular/análisis , Factor A de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular/metabolismo
7.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 100(20): e25954, 2021 May 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34011076

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Haploinsufficiency of A20 (HA20) is a novel genetic disease presented by Zhou et al in 2016. A20 is a protein encoded by TNFAIP3. Loss-of-function mutation in TNFAIP3 will trigger a new autoinflammatory disease: HA20. HA20-affected patients may develop a wide range of clinical manifestations, such as Behcet disease, rheumatoid arthritis, rheumatic fever, juvenile idiopathic arthritis, and systemic lupus erythematosus. HA20 is rarely reported, thus remaining far from thoroughly understood. Sixty-one cases of HA20 have been reported worldwide, among which 29 cases were diagnosed with Behcet disease ultimately. Moreover, 3 cases have been reported in China, which was the first report of HA20 characterized by Behcet disease. A comprehensive understanding of the pathogenic genes of HA20 could help us apply targeted therapy as soon as possible to improve patients' survival rates. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 2-year-old 3-month-old child was presented to our hospital with recurrent infectious enteritis and stomatitis. DIAGNOSIS: Genetic mutations were detected immediately, and a novel pathogenic mutation was found in TNFAIP3. A heterozygous mutation (c.436-437deTC) located at TNFAIP3 was confirmed. The present research indicated that the TNFAIP3 mutation of c.436-437deTC (p.L147Qfs∗7) accounted for familial Behcet-like autoinflammatory syndrome in the child suffering from HA20, while no variation in this locus was found in her parents. INTERVENTIONS: Symptomatic treatments including oral administration of prednisone (12.5 mg/d) and iron supplement were performed, and repeated infection was no longer observed in the child. Pain and activity limitation was found in the knee joints. The treatment regimen was adjusted to oral prednisone (12.5 mg/dose, 2 doses/d) and subcutaneous injection of rhTNFR:Fc (12.5 mg/week).Outcomes: At the last follow-up, the limbs' activities were normal, the inflammatory indicators were reduced or within the normal range. The prednisone dose was reduced to 7.5 mg/d, while the dose of rhTNFR:Fc was not changed. CONCLUSION: We have identified a novel pathogenic HA20 mutation. In this article, 1 case was analyzed in-depth in terms of clinical manifestations of the patient and new sources of such a novel disease, which might improve our understanding of this disease.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome de Behçet/diagnóstico , Haploinsuficiencia , Proteína 3 Inducida por el Factor de Necrosis Tumoral alfa/genética , Síndrome de Behçet/tratamiento farmacológico , Síndrome de Behçet/genética , Preescolar , Análisis Mutacional de ADN , Quimioterapia Combinada/métodos , Etanercept/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Humanos , Mutación con Pérdida de Función , Prednisona/administración & dosificación , Resultado del Tratamiento
8.
J Drugs Dermatol ; 20(4): 394-401, 2021 Apr 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33852247

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: We describe patient-reported outcomes and quality of life through 5 years of treatment in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis in the UNCOVER-1 and -2 studies. METHODS: This analysis included patients who were randomized to ixekizumab every 2 weeks then received ixekizumab every 4 weeks during the maintenance period, and who achieved static physician global assessment (0,1) at week 12, completed week 60, and entered the long-term extension period (weeks 60–264). Outcomes measures included responses in itch numeric rating scale (NRS), skin pain visual analog scale (VAS), and dermatology life quality index (DLQI) (0,1), and mean change from baseline in short form health survey (SF-36) mental (MCS) and physical component summaries (PCS), psoriasis skin appearance bothersomeness (PSAB), and work productivity activity impairment (WPAI). RESULTS: At week 264 in UNCOVER-1 and -2, the observed itch NRS ≥4 responses were 82.4% and 93.1%, respectively, the itch NRS=0 responses were 51.7% and 58.5%, respectively, the skin pain VAS=0 responses were 59.3% and 63.1%, respectively, and the DLQI (0,1) responses were 75.0% and 88.1%, respectively. The observed mean changes from baseline at week 264 in UNCOVER-1 and UNCOVER-2 were 3.4 and 6.5, respectively, for SF-36 MCS, 4.4 and 4.8, respectively, for SF-36 PCS, and -21.3 and -22.0, respectively, for PSAB. WPAI psoriasis item scores improved from baseline in both UNCOVER-1 and -2. CONCLUSION: Ixekizumab provided clinically meaningful and sustained improvements in itch, skin pain, DLQI, PSAB, SF-36 PCS, SF-36 MCS, and WPAI through 5 years of treatment in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. J Drugs Dermatol. 20(4):394-401. doi:10.36849/JDD.5821Visit the JDD Psoriasis Resource Center for more.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/administración & dosificación , Fármacos Dermatológicos/administración & dosificación , Dolor/tratamiento farmacológico , Psoriasis/tratamiento farmacológico , Calidad de Vida , Adulto , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/efectos adversos , Ensayos Clínicos Fase III como Asunto , Fármacos Dermatológicos/efectos adversos , Etanercept/administración & dosificación , Etanercept/efectos adversos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto , Dolor/diagnóstico , Dolor/etiología , Dolor/psicología , Dimensión del Dolor/estadística & datos numéricos , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Psoriasis/complicaciones , Psoriasis/diagnóstico , Psoriasis/psicología , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Resultado del Tratamiento
9.
J Manag Care Spec Pharm ; 27(4): 444-452, 2021 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33769851

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Use of costly biologic drugs for the treatment of chronic inflammatory diseases has increased significantly in recent years. However, biosimilar drugs offer an opportunity to ensure health system sustainability with robust uptake. OBJECTIVE: To study the effect of formulary listing strategies on the use of infliximab and etanercept innovator and biosimilar biologics. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study of individuals in Ontario, Canada, dispensed a biologic prescription for infliximab or etanercept through Ontario's public drug program between January 1, 2010, and June 30, 2019. Quarterly utilization and costs were forecasted using Holt-Winters' exponential smoothing models to the second quarter (Q2) of 2022. Secondary analyses explored utilization for rheumatic conditions (RC) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). RESULTS: From Q1 2010 to Q2 2019, infliximab and etanercept users increased by 75.7% (n = 4,073 to 7,158), with a forecasted increase of 13.7% (n = 8,142; 95% CI = 7,438-8,847) by Q2 2022. Biosimilar users represented 13.8% (n = 539 of 3,905) of total infliximab users in Q2 2019, although this differed by indication with 6.9% for IBD (n = 187 of 2,712) and 26.6% for RC (n = 203 of 764). Etanercept biosimilar users represented 20.2% (n = 659 of 3,256) of total etanercept users for RC in Q2 2019. Biologics expenditures increased 109.7% during the study, amounting to $49.9 million in Q2 2019. CONCLUSIONS: Despite differing reimbursement restrictions between innovator infliximab and etanercept biologics, the uptake of their biosimilars was low and not noticeably different in the treatment of RC. Dynamic policy strategies are needed to improve the uptake of biosimilars, particularly for IBD. DISCLOSURES: Funding for this study was contributed by the Ontario Ministry of Health. The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.


Asunto(s)
Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/uso terapéutico , Etanercept/uso terapéutico , Infliximab/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antirreumáticos/administración & dosificación , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/administración & dosificación , Estudios Transversales , Etanercept/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Humanos , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/tratamiento farmacológico , Infliximab/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ontario , Servicios Farmacéuticos , Adulto Joven
10.
Paediatr Drugs ; 23(2): 171-182, 2021 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33651370

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine patterns of initial prescriptions, investigate time to initiation of biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs), and evaluate the impact of clinical and other baseline factors associated with the time to first bDMARD in treating children with newly diagnosed non-systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). METHODS: Using longitudinal patient-level data extracted from electronic medical records (EMR) in a large Midwestern pediatric hospital from 2009 to 2018, the initial prescriptions and prescribing patterns of bDMARDs, conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs), non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and glucocorticoids within 3 months of JIA diagnosis were examined. Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed to assess time to initiation of bDMARDs. Cox proportional hazard models were used to identify factors associated with time to first bDMARD. RESULTS: Of 821 children, the proportion of patients with initial csDMARDs increased from 45.3% in 2009 to 60.3% in 2018. Around 57.5% of polyarthritis rheumatoid factor-positive (Poly RF+) patients and 43.2% of polyarthritis rheumatoid factor-negative (Poly RF-) patients received a bDMARD therapy within 3 months of diagnosis, 14.4% as monotherapy and 28.3% in combination with a csDMARD. Among patients who received combination therapy, combination of methotrexate with adalimumab increased from 16.7% in 2009 to 40% in 2018. The proportion of patients treated with adalimumab gradually increased and passed etanercept in 2016. The predictors of earlier initiation of biologic therapy were JIA category enthesitis-related arthritis (ERA) [hazard ratio (HR) vs persistent oligoarthritis 4.82; p < 0.0001], psoriatic arthritis (PsA) (HR 2.46; p = 0.0002), or Poly RF- (HR 2.43; p = 0.0002); the number of joints with limited range of motion (HR 1.02; p = 0.0222), and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR, HR 1.01; p = 0.0033). CONCLUSIONS: There was a substantial increase in the proportion of patients receiving the combination of methotrexate and adalimumab among patients receiving combination therapy. Adalimumab overtook etanercept as the most frequently prescribed bDMARD. Multiple factors affect the time to biologic initiation, including the number of joints with limited range of motion, ESR, and JIA category.


Asunto(s)
Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/uso terapéutico , Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Artritis Juvenil/tratamiento farmacológico , Terapia Biológica/métodos , Adalimumab/uso terapéutico , Adolescente , Artritis/tratamiento farmacológico , Niño , Preescolar , Etanercept/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Glucocorticoides/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Metotrexato/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos
12.
Pediatr Rheumatol Online J ; 19(1): 5, 2021 Jan 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33407590

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Remission is the primary objective of treating juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). It is still debatable whether early intensive treatment is superior in terms of earlier achievement of remission. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of early etanercept+methotrexate (ETA+MTX) combination therapy versus step-up MTX monotherapy with ETA added in refractory disease. METHODS: A multi-centre, double-blind, randomized study in active polyarticular JIA patients treated with either ETA+MTX (n = 35) or placebo+MTX (n = 33) for up to 24 weeks, followed by a 24-week open-label phase. The efficacy endpoints included pedACR30 criteria improvement at week 12, inactive disease at week 24, and remission at week 48. Patients who failed to achieve the endpoints at week 12 or at week 24 escaped to open-label ETA+MTX. Safety was assessed at each visit. RESULTS: By intention-to-treat analysis, more patients in the ETA+MTX group reached the pedACR30 response at week 12 (33 (94.3%)) than in the placebo+MTX group (20 (60.6%); p = 0.001). At week 24, comparable percentages of patients reached inactive disease (11 (31.4%) vs 11 (33.3%)). At week 48, 11 (31.4%) and eight (24.2%) patients achieved remission. The median (+/-IQR) times to achieve an inactive disease state in the ETA+MTX and placebo+MTX groups were 24 (14-32) and 32 (24-40) weeks, respectively. Forty-four (74/100 patient-years) adverse events (AEs) were reported, leading to treatment discontinuation in 6 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Early combination therapy with ETA+MTX proved to be highly effective compared to the standard step-up regimen. Compared to those treated with the standard regimen, more patients treated with a combination of ETA+MTX reached the pedACR30 response and achieved inactive disease and remission more rapidly.


Asunto(s)
Antirreumáticos/administración & dosificación , Artritis Juvenil/tratamiento farmacológico , Etanercept/administración & dosificación , Metotrexato/administración & dosificación , Adolescente , Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Niño , Preescolar , Método Doble Ciego , Quimioterapia Combinada , Etanercept/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Metotrexato/uso terapéutico , Inducción de Remisión/métodos
13.
Rheumatol Int ; 41(2): 381-390, 2021 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32876744

RESUMEN

Biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) monotherapy may enhance adherence and decrease adverse events compared to combination therapy with conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs); however, persistence with bDMARD monotherapy has not been extensively studied. We explore persistence of etanercept monotherapy and monotherapy with other tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFis) among patients first achieving remission/low disease activity (LDA) while on combination therapy with csDMARDs and a TNFi. Using Corrona registry data, the percentage of patients persistent with the index TNFi (etanercept versus other TNFis) over 6 and 12 months was determined. Factors influencing persistence and treatment patterns at 6 and 12 months were examined. Among 617 eligible patients, 56% of 182 patients on etanercept and 45% of 435 patients on other TNFis persisted with monotherapy at 6 months, 46% and 33%, respectively, at 12 months. Across first-line and subsequent biologic DMARDs, etanercept persistence was greater than other TNFi persistence by 10.8% (95% CI 2.1%, 19.6%) at 6 months and 11.4% (95% CI 0.9%, 21.9%) at 12 months. Patients on other TNFis were more likely to require reintroduction of csDMARD after 6 months (45% versus 35% for etanercept). Remission was the key predictor of persistence for both etanercept and other TNFi monotherapies. This retrospective, cohort study of registry data reflecting real-world practice indicates patients who achieve remission/LDA with combination csDMARD and TNFi therapy may successfully transition to TNFi monotherapy. Patients on etanercept monotherapy experienced greater persistence and less frequent reintroduction of a csDMARD than was observed for patients on other TNFi monotherapies.


Asunto(s)
Antirreumáticos/administración & dosificación , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Productos Biológicos/administración & dosificación , Etanercept/administración & dosificación , Metotrexato/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores del Factor de Necrosis Tumoral/administración & dosificación , Anciano , Antirreumáticos/efectos adversos , Productos Biológicos/efectos adversos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Etanercept/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Cumplimiento de la Medicación , Metotrexato/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sistema de Registros , Inducción de Remisión , Estudios Retrospectivos , Inhibidores del Factor de Necrosis Tumoral/efectos adversos
14.
Curr Pharm Biotechnol ; 22(2): 305-316, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32116188

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Clinical studies indicate that recombinant tumor necrosis factor receptor:Fc fusion protein (rhTNFR:Fc) quickly alleviates symptoms and physical signs of active Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS), improving the manifestation of spinal inflammation on radiological imaging. However, the regulatory mechanism of rhTNFR:Fc in the chemokine pathway is unclear. Thus we study the mechanism of phlogogenic activity of CXCL16/CXCR6 in AS and the related mechanism of rhTNFR: Fc treatment. METHODS: Thirty-two cases of active AS were treated with rhTNFR:Fc for 3 consecutive months. Clinical response was evaluated at baseline and after treatment. CXCL16/CXCR6 expression as well as Receptor Activator Of Nuclear Factor-Κb Ligand (RANKL)/Osteoprotegerin (OPG), essential molecules for osteoclast differentiation, were studied in AS before and after treatment. Further, the proliferation of lymphocytes and the RANKL level stimulated by recombinant human CXCL16 (rhCXCL16) were measured in vitro. RESULTS: Thirty cases responded to rhTNFR:Fc treatment. The RANKL level, RANKL/OPG ratio, CXCLl6 level in serum, and CXCLl6 and CXCR6 mRNA levels in active AS were higher than those in controls and treated patients (P<0.001). rhCXCL16 treatment increased lymphocyte proliferation and RANKL level in active AS (P<0.001), but not in controls or treated patients (P>0.05). A positive linear correlation was noted between CXCL16 serum levels and RANKL/OPG ratio and between CXCL16 levels and C-reactive protein results (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that rhTNFR:Fc suppresses inflammation and bone destruction of AS by reducing the RANKL/OPG ratio through inhibition of the CXCL16/CXCR6 pathway.


Asunto(s)
Quimiocina CXCL16/antagonistas & inhibidores , Etanercept/administración & dosificación , Osteoprotegerina/antagonistas & inhibidores , Ligando RANK/antagonistas & inhibidores , Receptores CXCR6/antagonistas & inhibidores , Espondilitis Anquilosante/tratamiento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Quimiocina CXCL16/metabolismo , Regulación hacia Abajo/efectos de los fármacos , Regulación hacia Abajo/fisiología , Femenino , Humanos , Inyecciones Subcutáneas , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Osteoprotegerina/metabolismo , Ligando RANK/metabolismo , Receptores CXCR6/metabolismo , Espondilitis Anquilosante/metabolismo , Adulto Joven
15.
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res ; 21(5): 1011-1016, 2021 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33086882

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Spending on drugs provided by the Brazilian Public Health System (BPHS) for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) increased substantially with the beginning of the supply of biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARD). This study aims to perform a cost-utility analysis of the most used biological drugs for the treatment of RA in Brazil. METHODS: a Markov model was used to carry out the cost-utility analysis. The data were obtained from a prospective cohort of RA patients using adalimumab, etanercept, and golimumab in Brazil. The BPHS perspective was adopted and the time horizon was five years. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate the uncertainty. RESULTS: golimumab was the most cost-effective drug. Etanercept was dominated by golimumab. Adalimumab presented an incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) of $95,095.37 compared to golimumab in five years of follow-up. These results were confirmed by sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION: the utility among adalimumab, etanercept, and golimumab was similar and the cost was the component that most impacted the economic model. Therefore, depending on the agreed price with the drug manufacturers, the incremental cost-utility ratio may vary among them.


Asunto(s)
Antirreumáticos/administración & dosificación , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Modelos Económicos , Inhibidores del Factor de Necrosis Tumoral/administración & dosificación , Adalimumab/administración & dosificación , Adalimumab/economía , Adulto , Anciano , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/economía , Antirreumáticos/economía , Artritis Reumatoide/economía , Brasil , Estudios de Cohortes , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Etanercept/administración & dosificación , Etanercept/economía , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Cadenas de Markov , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Inhibidores del Factor de Necrosis Tumoral/economía
16.
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res ; 21(4): 775-784, 2021 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33043757

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the cost-utility of Tofacitinib (TFC) in patients with severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who had not responded well to methotrexate from the Iranian payer's perspective. METHODS: An individual microsimulation Markov model was developed to compare TFC with etanercept (ETN) and Adalimumab (ADA) over a life-time horizon. Treatment efficacy was estimated based on the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) response improvement criteria in 6 months. Changes in the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) scores were mapped onto utility values to calculate outcomes in terms of QALYs. Direct medical costs were taken from national databases. Uncertainty in model parameters was evaluated by sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: This study demonstrated that TFC was cost-effective in both scenarios. Although TFC was associated with lower QALYs than ETN (6.664 versus 6.876), it was also associated with lower costs over a life-time horizon ($42,565.04 versus $58,696.29). Additionally, TFC was found to be the dominant strategy with a lower cost ($50,299.91 versus $51,550.29) and higher QALYs gained (6.900 versus 6.687) compared to ADA. CONCLUSION: TFC was found to be cost-effective in patients with severe RA who do not respond well to methotrexate compared to ADA, ETN in Iran.


Asunto(s)
Adalimumab/administración & dosificación , Antirreumáticos/administración & dosificación , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Etanercept/administración & dosificación , Piperidinas/administración & dosificación , Pirimidinas/administración & dosificación , Adalimumab/economía , Adulto , Antirreumáticos/economía , Artritis Reumatoide/economía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Etanercept/economía , Femenino , Humanos , Irán , Masculino , Cadenas de Markov , Metotrexato/administración & dosificación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Piperidinas/economía , Pirimidinas/economía , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Resultado del Tratamiento
17.
J Am Acad Dermatol ; 85(2): 360-368, 2021 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33253833

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To report the efficacy and safety of the approved ixekizumab (IXE) dose over 5 years from UNCOVER-3 (NCT01646177). METHODS: Patients (N = 1346) were randomized 1:2:2:2 to receive subcutaneous injections of placebo, etanercept 50 mg twice weekly, or IXE 80 mg every 2 weeks or every 4 weeks after an initial dose of IXE 160 mg, respectively. At week 12, patients entered the long-term extension period with dosing of IXE every 4 weeks and could escalate to every 2 weeks after week 60. Efficacy was reported for the IXE every 2 weeks/every 4 weeks group of the intent-to-treat population. Safety was reported for patients who received at least 1 dose of IXE every 2 or every 4 weeks. RESULTS: Using modified nonresponder imputation, 78.8%/67.1%/46.2% of patients receiving the approved dose of IXE every 2 weeks/every 4 weeks (n = 385) achieved ≥75%, ≥90%, or 100% improvement from baseline in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index, respectively, at week 264; static Physician's Global Assessment score of 0/1 and 0 responses were 69.2% and 45.3%, respectively. Infections were the most observed treatment-emergent adverse event (72.7% of patients). LIMITATIONS: Lack of comparison treatment group after week 12. CONCLUSION: IXE demonstrates sustained efficacy and consistent safety through 264 weeks in patients using the approved dose.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/administración & dosificación , Fármacos Dermatológicos/administración & dosificación , Etanercept/administración & dosificación , Psoriasis/tratamiento farmacológico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/efectos adversos , Fármacos Dermatológicos/efectos adversos , Método Doble Ciego , Esquema de Medicación , Etanercept/efectos adversos , Humanos , Inyecciones Subcutáneas , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
18.
J Manag Care Spec Pharm ; 27(1): 112-117, 2021 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33377437

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: List prices of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors drastically increased during the last decade, but previous research has shown that half of these increases were offset by rising manufacturer discounts. It remains unclear to what extent manufacturers' discounts have offset increases in list prices of each self-administered injectable TNF inhibitor. Evaluating trends in net prices and discounts at the product level will be paramount in understanding the role of competition in the biologic market. OBJECTIVES: To (a) describe product-level changes in net prices of each self-administered injectable TNF inhibitor available in 2007-2019 and (b) quantify to what extent manufacturer discounts have offset increases in list prices. METHODS: We obtained 2007-2019 pricing data for etanercept, adalimumab, certolizumab, and golimumab from the investment firm SSR Health, which uses company-reported sales to estimate net prices and discounts for brand products manufactured by publicly traded companies. For each drug and year, we calculated annual costs of treatment for patients with rheumatoid arthritis based on list and net prices and discounts in Medicaid and other payers. RESULTS: From 2007-2019, list prices of etanercept and adalimumab increased by 293% and 295%, respectively; however, discounts offset 47% and 45% of these increases, leading to net price increases of 171% and 203%. List prices of golimumab and certolizumab increased by 183% and 182%, respectively, but with discounts offsetting 58% and 59% of these increases, net prices increased by 103% and 109%. Net prices of golimumab started to decrease after 2016, while net prices of adalimumab and certolizumab experienced their first drop in 2019. Across the study period, discounts in Medicaid and in other payers increased, respectively, from 21% to 85% and 6% to 32% for etanercept; from 26% to 88% and 19% to 35% for adalimumab; from 28% to 63% and 22% to 46% for golimumab; and from 29% to 83% and 27% to 47% for certolizumab. CONCLUSIONS: Despite growing manufacturer discounts, net prices of self-administered injectable TNF inhibitors still increased at a mean annual rate of 9.6% in 2007-2019. This led to net prices tripling for adalimumab and more than doubling for etanercept, golimumab, and certolizumab. DISCLOSURES: This study was funded by the Myers Family Foundation. Hernandez is funded by the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (grant number K01HL142847). Funding sources had no role in design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; or decision to submit the manuscript for publication. Hernandez has served on Pfizer's scientific advisory board. The other authors have nothing to disclose.


Asunto(s)
Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Costos de los Medicamentos/tendencias , Factor de Necrosis Tumoral alfa/antagonistas & inhibidores , Adalimumab/administración & dosificación , Adalimumab/economía , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/economía , Antirreumáticos/administración & dosificación , Etanercept/administración & dosificación , Etanercept/economía , Humanos , Inyecciones , Autoadministración , Estados Unidos
19.
Mod Rheumatol ; 31(2): 319-325, 2021 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32735145

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To compare the radiographic and clinical effects of 25 versus 10 mg twice-weekly (BIW) etanercept over 52 weeks in Japanese patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: This was a post-hoc analysis of a Phase 3 study where Japanese patients with active RA were randomized to receive BIW etanercept 25 mg (n = 182), etanercept 10 mg (n = 192), or methotrexate (n = 176) for 52 weeks (NCT00445770). This analysis included assessments of week-24 and week-52 disease activity, week-52 radiographic progression, and the relationship between baseline characteristics and week 52 clinical outcomes with clinically relevant radiographic progression (CRRP) at week 52. RESULTS: At week 52, there were no significant differences between 25 and 10 mg etanercept in terms of achieving low disease activity or remission. CRRP was observed in 36% and 32% of patients in the 10 and 25 mg groups, respectively. Predictor analysis suggested that worse background disease status, treatment with methotrexate rather than etanercept, and poorer clinical outcomes at week 52 were associated with CRRP. CONCLUSIONS: The 25 mg BIW etanercept dosage does not appear to be significantly more efficacious than 10 mg in Japanese patients with RA. Further studies evaluating the optimal etanercept dosing regimen in this patient population may be merited. NCT: NCT00445770.


Asunto(s)
Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Etanercept/uso terapéutico , Antirreumáticos/administración & dosificación , Esquema de Medicación , Etanercept/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad
20.
PLoS One ; 15(12): e0244620, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33373425

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Real-world clinical data on psoriasis patients receiving different biological agents is needed, especially in Asian populations. OBJECTIVES: Our aim is to compare and analyze the efficacy and safety profile of four biological agents (etanercept, adalimumab, ustekinumab and secukinumab) in a real-world setting in Taiwan. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of all patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis (Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) ≥ 10) who received etanercept, adalimumab, ustekinumab or secukinumab between January 2011 and December 2018 in a tertiary hospital in Taiwan. RESULTS: A total of 119 treatment episodes in 75 patients were included in this study. Ustekinumab was used in 49 treatment episodes, followed by secukinumab in 46 treatment episodes, adalimumab in 14 treatment episodes and etanercept in 10 treatment episodes. The proportion of the biologic-naïve was highest in etanercept (100%) and lowest in secukinumab (23.9%). The PASI-75, -90 and -100 were the highest in secukinumab (91.3%, 82.6%, 41.3%, respectively), followed by ustekinumab (79.6%, 44.9%, 16.3%), adalimumab (64.3%, 28.6%, 7.1%) and etanercept (50.0%, 30.0%, 0%). The rate of adverse events that required treatment was highest for secukinumab (15.2%), followed by adalimumab (14.3%), ustekinumab (8.2%), and etanercept (0%), including 4 cases of infections, 2 cases of cardiovascular diseases and 4 cases of cancers. CONCLUSIONS: This real world data showed differential efficacy and safety of the four biological agents.


Asunto(s)
Adalimumab/administración & dosificación , Etanercept/administración & dosificación , Psoriasis/tratamiento farmacológico , Ustekinumab/administración & dosificación , Adalimumab/efectos adversos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/efectos adversos , Factores Biológicos/administración & dosificación , Factores Biológicos/efectos adversos , Etanercept/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Taiwán , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ustekinumab/efectos adversos , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...